AI Enablement
You rolled out the licences and ran the training. Now leadership wants to know whether any of it landed. Worktype captures how your best people work with AI, promotes it as the standard, and gives you the evidence that it spread — mapped by the kind of work people do, and exportable for the deck you already have to write.
Seven days free · no card · works with Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini
The problem
You can see who has a licence. You cannot see whether anyone changed how they work — and that is the only thing leadership is actually asking about.
Seats tell you who has access. They say nothing about whether a standard way of working with AI has spread, or stalled.
A pulse survey is a snapshot and an opinion. It can't show that one team's good practice reached the people doing the same job elsewhere.
Someone works out a better way, writes it in a doc, and the forty people who'd use it never open it. Documented is not the same as spread.
How it works
Enablement stops depending on you pushing it. The good work surfaces itself, spreads on its own, and leaves a record you can show.
People save the prompts that work as a by-product of doing the job — through a browser extension that sits beside Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Nobody is asked to donate anything.
Usage nominates the good ones. When several people who didn't write a prompt keep reaching for it, it surfaces for a curator to promote into the standard for that kind of work.
The standard is routed by work type — to everyone who does that kind of work, wherever they sit on the org chart. Not to a team channel most of the recipients aren't in.
Every copy is evidence. You get four measures of whether the program is working, and where it hasn't landed yet — the answer to the question leadership keeps asking.
Why it spreads when other tools don't
A work type is not a team. It is a kind of work — and people do the same kind of work in different departments, business units and locations. External Affairs, Government Relations and site-level community relations may all draft the same kind of stakeholder correspondence while sitting in four different orgs.
Worktype reaches people by what they do, not where they sit. That is the difference between a standard that spreads and a prompt gallery scoped to a team, where most of the people who'd use the material aren't members. For an AI Center of Excellence, it is the whole point: a practice that escapes the group that invented it.
The evidence
Usage counts are table stakes. These four answer the question a licence dashboard can't: is a standard way of working actually spreading?
Which individual prompts are being picked up by people other than their author — the signal that something is genuinely good, not just common.
Whether a practice escaped the work type that invented it. A prompt copied fifty times inside its own group has not spread; this is the proof that it travelled.
Whether the program is self-sustaining — the share of people putting something in — or still dependent on you pushing it.
Which kinds of work are standardised and which are still ad hoc, mapped by work type. The map of where AI has and hasn't landed.
Every measure exports to CSV and to a screenshot-ready view — built for the leadership deck you already have to write.
Built for this job
Worktype was built by someone who ran AI enablement inside a large enterprise — and hit the same wall every enablement lead hits: good practice that gets documented and never circulates. It is the tool that wall needed. Not theory.
Start free and set it up this afternoon, or find out where your program stands first. Either way, you leave with something you can put in front of leadership.
Seven days free · No card · No per-seat metering, so rolling it out never costs more